Sociology Of Education And The Role Of Education In Society Case Study - 3

Sociology Of Education And The Role Of Education In Society - Case Study Example According to Alan Barcan(1993), the word ‘sociology’ has come from the Latin word ‘socii’ meaning ‘groups’ or ‘allies’. This means that sociology is the study of social groups. The word ‘sociology’ was first used by Auguste Comte in 1837 and it was rough during the days of Comte, it has been explained by Craig J. Calhoun, & Joseph Gerteis(2007) that theories began to be sociological. Theories began to focus on social life as an object of study. This new perspective of the social side of human existence developed, argue Craig. J. et al (2007), due to the rise of science, individualism, modern states, large scale capitalistic markets, modern industry, and European explorations and colonization. Thus, as man’s life expanded beyond his town or village, he began to study to, to use the words of The British Sociological Association (BSA) ‘how society is organized and how we experience life’. Let us see the definition given by American Sociological Association (ASA) and find out where we can place education in the domain of sociology: This definition, especially its last point, tells us how sociology is related to education since it is a unification of all studies of mankind. Thus ‘sociology of education’ and ‘educational sociology’ are the sub-disciplines of sociology and education. Education of an individual is not only confined to an individual’s life but it is also a social phenomenon in reciprocal terms. An individual is influenced by society when he gets an education and, in turn, he may influence society after getting an education. All the people of great genius like Aristotle, Confucius, Homer, Sir Isaac Newton, Galileo Galilei, Albert Einstein, Pablo Picasso, Michelangelo, William Shakespeare, Abraham Lincoln, Mother Teresa, Nelson Mandela, and others in different fields, influenced society.

Paper that explains the communication aspects, personality & Research

That explains the communication aspects, personality & leadership styles used in management - Research Paper Example The aim of this paper is to explain the main management and leadership styles that can be utilized in by managers in their efforts to deliver effective management. The paper explains how managers can bridge the gap between upper management and front line workers by enhancing communication. It also shows how managers should work towards the attainment of big five personality dimensions and other critical leadership skills. Management styles There are four main management styles that can be applied by managers depending on the specific environments. These are the autocrat, benevolent autocrat, participatory democrat and consultative democrat. An autocrat type of manager is one that manages by telling others what to do and how to do it. This type of a manager has minimum confidence on their subordinates and most often, they do not trust them. This type of leadership is not the best for an industrial or a business environment because it results to ill treatment of workers. Workers will b e treatment as automations instead of human beings with natural limitations. As the organization expands, the freedom of workers to make decision without approval reduces and so does shared ideas. The final result of this management style is high turn-over rates (Montana and Bruce, 2008). A benevolent autocrat type of manager pictures themselves as a father figure whose role is to make important decisions then they look for ways to convince their subordinates to join them in following them. Sometimes, these managers allow subordinates to make minor decisions within the limits hey set for them. In this type of management, rewards and punishments are used to motivate employees From its name, a consultative democrat is a type of manager who consults with their subordinates. Montana and Bruce (2008) explains that these types of managers have trust and confidence in their employees and this drives them to consult with them. Before making decisions, such managers always get the views of t he employees on it. However, they are the ones with a final say when it comes making the actual decision. Slightly different from a consultative democrat, a participatory democrat is a type of manager who allows employees to have an active role in decision-making. They share with them the decision-making process because they have full trust and confidence in them. Whenever there is an issue or a decision to be made, the manager invites all the stakeholders so that they can discuss. The final decision represents the views of the majority. Leadership styles in management The main role of a leader is to ensure the accomplishment of a common task by enlisting aid and support from others. This is a process of social influence. The most common leadership styles are authoritative, democratic, afflictive and coaching. In authoritative leadership style, there total centralization of decision-making powers. Authoritative leaders do not welcome initiatives or suggestions from their subordinate s and because of this, decision-making is quick and unilateral. However, it gives managers a very string motivation while demoralizing their subordinates. In democratic or participative type of leadership, group decision-making is favored. This is seen where such leaders consult with the group before giving instructions. This means their decisional are not unilateral. Through this, such leaders motivate their groups effectively and positively